From the National Affairs article ?Does School Choice ?Work?? by Frederick M. Hess (here):
If advocates of market-oriented school reform accept this
diagnosis, they can take a number of steps to improve their practical and
political prospects?..
?. Second, reformers should broaden the educational-choice
discussion beyond "school" choice. The narrow vocabulary of school
choice made more sense 20 years ago, when online tutoring and virtual schooling
were the stuff of science fiction, and when home schooling was still a
curiosity. But in 2010, this language is profoundly limiting. In the
health-care debate, even the most ardent single-payer enthusiasts believed that
patients should be free to make a series of choices among physicians and
providers of care. Yet in education, the most expansive vision of choice asks
parents to decide among schools A, B, and C. This kind of choice may appeal to
urban parents eager to escape awful schools; it does little, however, for
suburban parents who generally like their schools but would like to take
advantage of customized or higher-quality math or foreign-language instruction.
A promising solution would be to permit families to redirect a portion of the
dollars spent on their children through the educational equivalent of a health
savings account.
Such a mechanism would help families address children's unmet
needs (such as extra tutoring in difficult subjects, or advanced instruction in
areas of particular aptitude); it would also allow niche providers to emerge, would
foster price competition for particular services, and would make educational
choice relevant to many more families.
And concludes:
It would seem, then, that school choice "works" in some respects and in some instances ? but that choice alone could never work as well as many of its champions have expected, and promised. It is time for those who would like to transform America's schools to let go of the dream that choice by itself is any kind of "solution." The goal ought to be a much more serious agenda of school deregulation and re-invention.
apple earnings report john l smith apple earnings the glass castle jennifer hudson trial north korea threat brandon jacobs
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.